fxnumbersEN · English
BROKER COMPARISON

Same market.See the differences.

Choose up to three brands. Open any value to inspect the evidence.

Calculate a spread-cost scenario →
GermanyRegulatory jurisdiction
Partial ratings · 60% data + 40% editorial

Test editorial inputs are simulated. Only 2% of the planned data weight is supported for the rated cohort. Choose another broker for a side-by-side comparison. Missing data is not zero. Methodology

1 broker in view

Back to Ratings
Broker comparison for Germany. Scores apply only to the documented scope.
Measure
Pepperstone
View broker profile →
FXNumbers test / combined score4.0 / 5Editorial input simulated
Data component · 60%5.0 / 5
Editorial component · 40%50.0% · test input
Data coverage2% of planned data weight
Contracting companyPepperstone GmbHGermany
Company sourceOpen source ↗
Advertised EUR/USD minimum spreadNo shared verified input
Realised average spreadNo shared verified input
Trading commissionsNo shared verified input
Overnight holding costNo shared verified input
Inactivity charge policy
No stated charge
Why this value? & source

Pepperstone GmbH German costs document, page 4, section Inaktivitaetsgebuehr: no account-maintenance or inactivity fees. Policy indicator only; does not measure execution or total costs. No publication date stated; checked 12 September 2026.

Parameter score: 5.0 / 5. Effective weight: 100.0% of the partial data score.

Original source ↗Observed 2026-09-12 · review due 2026-10-12Conversion rules

Values come from the published FXNumbers database. Shared parameters can change when you change the selected brokers or country. No winner is inferred from incomplete evidence.