الواجهة مترجمة. تبقى نصوص المصادر وبعض تفاصيل المنهجية بالإنجليزية.
تقييمات الوسطاء · استكشف كل مستوى
تقييم واحد. كل الأسباب.
اختر بلد إقامتك أو استكشف الشركات وراء العلامات.
أين تخضع شركة الوسيط للرقابة؟ · قد تعمل العلامة عبر عدة شركات. اختر دولة لاستكشاف الشركات الخاضعة للرقابة فيها.
تجريبي · يتضمن مدخلات تحريرية محاكاةكيف يصبح تقييماً كاملاً
مع اتساع التغطية تحل البيانات المنشورة والتقييمات التحريرية المكتملة محل المدخلات التجريبية، وفق المنهج المنشور.
Current data coverage: 2% of planned weight. Coverage describes our evidence, not broker quality. المنهج ←
ألمانياCalculated from: Germany · 1 shared parameters · 1/11 monitored jurisdictionsRated: Pepperstone. Single-broker evidence only; no peer comparison. Missing ratings are not zero. Criteria can differ between countries.
دليل الألوان — ماذا تعني علامات الدول؟
Market priority: UK, US, Singapore and Hong Kong lead by FX turnover in the BIS 2025 survey. Remaining countries follow an editorial priority order, not a statistical ranking. This order does not change rating weights.
توضح الألوان كمية المعلومات المتاحة ولا تحكم على جودة الوسيط.
أخضر · المقياسان متاحانBoth tracked measures are available for every displayed broker.
أصفر · معلومات جزئيةSome observations are available, but coverage differs or is incomplete.
أحمر · بيانات التقييم مفقودةCompanies are identified, but their rating observations are not available yet.
…فارغ · جارٍ التحققAt least one company or offer still needs verification; no observations are available for this selection.
∕رمادي بخط مائل · غير منطبقWe have verified that this option does not apply.
إطار مربع · اختياركThe chosen country applies to all three brokers.
ALL shows the overall comparison across included companies. It is not a country.
First convert the data score to a percentage. Add its 60% contribution to the editorial percentage’s 40% contribution. A simulated 50% editorial input contributes 20 percentage points. Real assessments use the published criterion weights. Displayed inputs are rounded; contributions use the unrounded data score.
IG
Data component: —/5
Editorial input: 50.0% (test only)
No combined score: both components are required.
Assessment scope: brand
User-requested uniform test input. No editorial review has been performed; not derived from Trustpilot or a website audit.
These criterion weights are managed in the editorial database. They apply to completed editorial assessments; simulated inputs remain explicitly labelled and are not derived from these criteria.
Public review evidence, including Trustpilot30% of editorial
Website navigation and usability25%
Clarity of pricing, conditions and information30%
Visibility of the contracting company and key documents15%
Published documentary audits have dated observations, cited sources and explicit scope. See the UK audit and checklist. Review-platform scores alone are not editorial assessments. Brand-wide review evidence must not be presented as jurisdiction-specific evidence, and evidence already scored in the data component must not be counted twice.
01 · Data component: Jurisdictions — where the rating comes from
Identical included jurisdictions and equal jurisdiction weights for all brands. Missing values are never zero.
Effective dimension weight: 0% of the partial score.
OANDA
Trading costs · partial
—/5
Effective dimension weight: 0% of the partial score.
Pepperstone
Trading costs · partial
5.0/5
Effective dimension weight: 100% of the partial score.
Each planned dimension has 20% of the data-component weight (the data component itself has 60% of the combined rating). The partial score normalises only shared available weights.
03 · Cost parameters — compare each contribution
Open a parameter to see each rated broker, including conversion, weight and source. Unrated brokers have no contribution.
Advertised EUR/USD minimum spread Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
Realised average spread Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
Trading commissions Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
Overnight holding cost Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
Inactivity charge policy 10% planned cost weight → 100.0% of this partial score
IG
No verified comparable input for this broker.
OANDA
No verified comparable input for this broker.
Pepperstone
Regulated in Germany
5.0/5
Contribution: 5.0 × 100.0% = 5.0
04 · Input, conversion & source
Original input: 0 · no inactivity charge stated
Policy rubric: no stated charge → 5/5. This does not measure fee amount or severity.
Pepperstone GmbH
Pepperstone GmbH German costs document, page 4, section Inaktivitaetsgebuehr: no account-maintenance or inactivity fees. Policy indicator only; does not measure execution or total costs. No publication date stated; checked 12 September 2026.
Observed 2026-09-12 · review due 2026-10-12 Record pepperstone-de-inactivity-2026-09-12 One broker-published source; no independent execution sample or statistical confidence estimate.
