इंटरफ़ेस अनुवादित है। स्रोतों के पाठ और कार्यप्रणाली के कुछ विवरण अंग्रेज़ी में हैं।

ब्रोकर रेटिंग · हर स्तर देखें

एक रेटिंग।
हर कारण।

अपना निवास चुनें या ब्रांड के पीछे की संस्थाएँ देखें।

ब्रोकर कंपनी कहाँ विनियमित है? · एक ब्रांड कई कंपनियों के माध्यम से काम कर सकता है। वहाँ विनियमित कंपनियाँ देखने के लिए देश चुनें।

पायलट · सिम्युलेटेड संपादकीय इनपुट शामिल
यह पूर्ण रेटिंग कैसे बनेगी

कवरेज बढ़ने पर प्रकाशित अवलोकन और पूर्ण संपादकीय मूल्यांकन डेमो इनपुट की जगह लेंगे। स्कोर प्रकाशित विधि से अपडेट होंगे।

Current data coverage: 4% of planned weight. Coverage describes our evidence, not broker quality. विधि →

यूनाइटेड किंगडमCalculated from: United Kingdom · 2 shared parameters · 1/11 monitored jurisdictionsRated: IG, OANDA, Pepperstone. Same parameters for the rated brokers. Missing ratings are not zero. Criteria can differ between countries.
रंग मार्गदर्शिका — देश के संकेतों का अर्थ क्या है?

Market priority: UK, US, Singapore and Hong Kong lead by FX turnover in the BIS 2025 survey. Remaining countries follow an editorial priority order, not a statistical ranking. This order does not change rating weights.

रंग उपलब्ध जानकारी की मात्रा दिखाते हैं, ब्रोकर की गुणवत्ता नहीं।

  • हरा · दोनों मापदंड उपलब्धBoth tracked measures are available for every displayed broker.
  • पीला · आंशिक जानकारीSome observations are available, but coverage differs or is incomplete.
  • लाल · रेटिंग डेटा अनुपलब्धCompanies are identified, but their rating observations are not available yet.
  • खाली · जाँच जारीAt least one company or offer still needs verification; no observations are available for this selection.
  • स्लैश वाला धूसर · लागू नहींWe have verified that this option does not apply.
  • चौकोर सीमा · आपका चयनThe chosen country applies to all three brokers.

ALL shows the overall comparison across included companies. It is not a country.

डेमो · सिम्युलेटेड संपादकीय3.9/5

डेटा कवरेज: 4%

स्कोर के घटक और कंपनी
Selected jurisdiction: United Kingdom

IG Markets Limited
Regulatory jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Entity source ↗

Data: 4.9/5 × 60%
Editorial test: 50% × 40%

Data completeness - 4% of planned data weight4%

ब्रोकर प्रोफ़ाइल → यह स्कोर क्यों? → तुलना में जोड़ें +

डेमो · सिम्युलेटेड संपादकीय2.7/5

डेटा कवरेज: 4%

स्कोर के घटक और कंपनी
Selected jurisdiction: United Kingdom

OANDA Europe Limited
Regulatory jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Entity source ↗

Data: 2.9/5 × 60%
Editorial test: 50% × 40%

Data completeness - 4% of planned data weight4%

ब्रोकर प्रोफ़ाइल → यह स्कोर क्यों? → तुलना में जोड़ें +

डेमो · सिम्युलेटेड संपादकीय3.6/5

डेटा कवरेज: 4%

स्कोर के घटक और कंपनी
Selected jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Pepperstone Limited
Regulatory jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Entity source ↗

Data: 4.3/5 × 60%
Editorial test: 50% × 40%

Data completeness - 4% of planned data weight4%

ब्रोकर प्रोफ़ाइल → यह स्कोर क्यों? → तुलना में जोड़ें +

रेटिंग देखें: गणना, मानदंड और स्रोत

सभी दिखाए गए ब्रोकर की तुलना।

Score mix — data and editorial contribution
60% · Data40% · Editorial

First convert the data score to a percentage. Add its 60% contribution to the editorial percentage’s 40% contribution. A simulated 50% editorial input contributes 20 percentage points. Real assessments use the published criterion weights. Displayed inputs are rounded; contributions use the unrounded data score.

IG

Data component: 4.9/5

Editorial input: 50.0% (test only)

(4.9 ÷ 5 × 60) + (50 ÷ 100 × 40)
≈ 58.4 + 20.0
= 78.4% = 3.9/5

Assessment scope: brand

User-requested uniform test input. No editorial review has been performed; not derived from Trustpilot or a website audit.

Explore the data component →

OANDA

Data component: 2.9/5

Editorial input: 50.0% (test only)

(2.9 ÷ 5 × 60) + (50 ÷ 100 × 40)
≈ 34.4 + 20.0
= 54.4% = 2.7/5

Assessment scope: brand

User-requested uniform test input. No editorial review has been performed; not derived from Trustpilot or a website audit.

Explore the data component →

Pepperstone

Data component: 4.3/5

Editorial input: 50.0% (test only)

(4.3 ÷ 5 × 60) + (50 ÷ 100 × 40)
≈ 52.0 + 20.0
= 72.0% = 3.6/5

Assessment scope: brand

User-requested uniform test input. No editorial review has been performed; not derived from Trustpilot or a website audit.

Explore the data component →

Editorial review — published weights

These criterion weights are managed in the editorial database. They apply to completed editorial assessments; simulated inputs remain explicitly labelled and are not derived from these criteria.

Public review evidence, including Trustpilot30% of editorial
Website navigation and usability25%
Clarity of pricing, conditions and information30%
Visibility of the contracting company and key documents15%

Published documentary audits have dated observations, cited sources and explicit scope. See the UK audit and checklist. Review-platform scores alone are not editorial assessments. Brand-wide review evidence must not be presented as jurisdiction-specific evidence, and evidence already scored in the data component must not be counted twice.

01 · Data component: Jurisdictions — where the rating comes from

Identical included jurisdictions and equal jurisdiction weights for all brands. Missing values are never zero.

Display values are rounded; calculations use unrounded inputs.

02 · Dimensions — what is assessed

Only Trading costs currently has usable evidence. Other dimensions are excluded, not scored zero.

Trading costsPartial · 20% of cost weight availableOpen cost parameters ↓
Client experienceNo comparable evidence
Funding experienceNo comparable evidence
Service responseNo comparable evidence
Digital experienceNo comparable evidence

IG

Trading costs · partial

4.9/5

Effective dimension weight: 100% of the partial score.

OANDA

Trading costs · partial

2.9/5

Effective dimension weight: 100% of the partial score.

Pepperstone

Trading costs · partial

4.3/5

Effective dimension weight: 100% of the partial score.

Each planned dimension has 20% of the data-component weight (the data component itself has 60% of the combined rating). The partial score normalises only shared available weights.

03 · Cost parameters — compare each contribution

Open a parameter to see each rated broker, including conversion, weight and source. Unrated brokers have no contribution.

Advertised EUR/USD minimum spread 10% planned cost weight → 50.0% of this partial score

IG

Regulated in United Kingdom

4.7/5

Contribution: 4.7 × 50.0% = 2.4

04 · Input, conversion & source

Original input: 0.6 pips

clamp(1 + 4 × (2 − 0.6) ÷ (2 − 0.5), 1, 5) = 4.7/5

IG Markets Limited

Cash FX CFD advertised minimum EUR/USD spread: 0.6 pips (points). Spread-only pricing; financing and other charges excluded. The historical average spread also displayed by IG Australia is not used.

मूल स्रोत ↗

Observed 2026-09-12 · review due 2026-10-12
Record ig-gb-eurusd-20260912
One broker-published source; no independent execution sample or statistical confidence estimate.

OANDA

Regulated in United Kingdom

4.7/5

Contribution: 4.7 × 50.0% = 2.4

04 · Input, conversion & source

Original input: 0.6 pips

clamp(1 + 4 × (2 − 0.6) ÷ (2 − 0.5), 1, 5) = 4.7/5

OANDA Europe Limited

Standard spread-only EUR/USD CFD pricing, advertised from 0.6 pips. Raw pricing excluded. Financing and other charges excluded; not a realised average.

मूल स्रोत ↗

Observed 2026-09-12 · review due 2026-10-12
Record oanda-gb-eurusd-20260912
One broker-published source; no independent execution sample or statistical confidence estimate.

Pepperstone

Regulated in United Kingdom

3.7/5

Contribution: 3.7 × 50.0% = 1.8

04 · Input, conversion & source

Original input: 1 pips

clamp(1 + 4 × (2 − 1) ÷ (2 − 0.5), 1, 5) = 3.7/5

Pepperstone Limited

Standard account EUR/USD minimum spread: 1 pip. No FX commission on Standard. Razor and spread-betting pricing excluded. Financing and other charges excluded.

मूल स्रोत ↗

Observed 2026-09-12 · review due 2026-10-12
Record pepperstone-gb-eurusd-20260912
One broker-published source; no independent execution sample or statistical confidence estimate.

Realised average spread Excluded · no common evidence

This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.

Trading commissions Excluded · no common evidence

This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.

Overnight holding cost Excluded · no common evidence

This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.

Inactivity charge policy 10% planned cost weight → 50.0% of this partial score

IG

Regulated in United Kingdom

5.0/5

Contribution: 5.0 × 50.0% = 2.5

04 · Input, conversion & source

Original input: 0 · no inactivity charge stated

Policy rubric: no stated charge → 5/5. This does not measure fee amount or severity.

IG Markets Limited

The CFD section currently lists inactivity as free. Encoded 0: no inactivity charge stated. Australian inactivity terms have not been verified for this dataset.

मूल स्रोत ↗

Observed 2026-09-12 · review due 2026-10-12
Record ig-gb-inactivity-20260912
One broker-published source; no independent execution sample or statistical confidence estimate.

OANDA

Regulated in United Kingdom

1.0/5

Contribution: 1.0 × 50.0% = 0.5

04 · Input, conversion & source

Original input: 100 · inactivity charge stated

Policy rubric: stated charge → 1/5. This does not measure fee amount or severity.

OANDA Europe Limited

Monthly inactivity charge after 12 months without trading; no charge while open positions remain. Maximum GBP 20 per client per month across subaccounts, limited by available balance. Encoded 100: an inactivity charge is stated; this is not the charge amount.

मूल स्रोत ↗

Observed 2026-09-12 · review due 2026-10-12
Record oanda-gb-inactivity-20260912
One broker-published source; no independent execution sample or statistical confidence estimate.

Pepperstone

Regulated in United Kingdom

5.0/5

Contribution: 5.0 × 50.0% = 2.5

04 · Input, conversion & source

Original input: 0 · no inactivity charge stated

Policy rubric: no stated charge → 5/5. This does not measure fee amount or severity.

Pepperstone Limited

No account-keeping or inactivity charge currently stated. Accounts below 10 units of account currency with no trades for at least three months may be archived; reactivation is possible. Encoded 0: no inactivity charge stated.

मूल स्रोत ↗

Observed 2026-09-12 · review due 2026-10-12
Record pepperstone-gb-inactivity-20260912
One broker-published source; no independent execution sample or statistical confidence estimate.

05 · Methodology, thresholds and limitations →