Interfaz traducida. Los textos de fuentes y algunos detalles metodológicos se conservan en inglés.
VALORACIONES · EXPLORA CADA NIVEL
Una valoración. Todas las razones.
Elige tu residencia o explora las empresas detrás de las marcas.
¿Dónde vives? · Selecciona tu país con los círculos. Mostramos la empresa y las condiciones verificadas para sus residentes.
Piloto · incluye valoraciones editoriales simuladasCómo se convierte en una valoración completa
Los datos publicados y las evaluaciones editoriales completas sustituyen la demo al aumentar la cobertura. Se aplica el método publicado.
Current data coverage: 0% of planned weight. Coverage describes our evidence, not broker quality. Método →
Hong KongCalculated from: No common evidence · 0 shared parameters · 0/11 listed residence marketsNo shared rating evidence in this selection. Missing ratings are not zero. Criteria can differ between countries.
Guía de colores — ¿qué indican los países?
Market priority: UK, US, Singapore and Hong Kong lead by FX turnover in the BIS 2025 survey. Remaining countries follow an editorial priority order, not a statistical ranking. This order does not change rating weights.
Los colores indican cuánta información tenemos, no la calidad del bróker.
Verde · ambas medidas disponiblesBoth tracked measures are available for every displayed broker.
Amarillo · información parcialSome observations are available, but coverage differs or is incomplete.
Rojo · faltan datos de valoraciónCompanies are identified, but their rating observations are not available yet.
…Vacío · en verificaciónAt least one company or offer still needs verification; no observations are available for this selection.
∕Gris con barra · no aplicableWe have verified that this option does not apply.
Borde cuadrado · tu selecciónThe chosen country applies to all three brokers.
Explorar valoraciones: cálculos, criterios y fuentes
Comparando todos los brókeres mostrados.
Score mix — data and editorial contribution
60% · Data40% · Editorial
First convert the data score to a percentage. Add its 60% contribution to the editorial percentage’s 40% contribution. A simulated 50% editorial input contributes 20 percentage points. Real assessments use the published criterion weights. Displayed inputs are rounded; contributions use the unrounded data score.
IG
Data component: —/5
Editorial input: 50.0% (test only)
No combined score: both components are required.
Assessment scope: brand
User-requested uniform test input. No editorial review has been performed; not derived from Trustpilot or a website audit.
These criterion weights are managed in the editorial database. They apply to completed editorial assessments; simulated inputs remain explicitly labelled and are not derived from these criteria.
Public review evidence, including Trustpilot30% of editorial
Website navigation and usability25%
Clarity of pricing, conditions and information30%
Visibility of the contracting company and key documents15%
Published documentary audits have dated observations, cited sources and explicit scope. See the UK audit and checklist. Review-platform scores alone are not editorial assessments. Brand-wide review evidence must not be presented as jurisdiction-specific evidence, and evidence already scored in the data component must not be counted twice.
01 · Data component: Residence & entity — where the rating comes from
The same residence and parameters for all brands; contracting entities may be regulated in different countries. Missing values are never zero.
IG
No common set to average.
OANDA
No common set to average.
Pepperstone
No common set to average.
Display values are rounded; calculations use unrounded inputs.
02 · Dimensions — what is assessed
No dimension has a common verified rating for this selection. Pending mappings and missing observations are not scored zero.
Effective dimension weight: 0% of the partial score.
OANDA
Trading costs · partial
—/5
Effective dimension weight: 0% of the partial score.
Pepperstone
Trading costs · partial
—/5
Effective dimension weight: 0% of the partial score.
Each planned dimension has 20% of the data-component weight (the data component itself has 60% of the combined rating). The partial score normalises only shared available weights.
03 · Cost parameters — compare each contribution
Open a parameter to see each rated broker, including conversion, weight and source. Unrated brokers have no contribution.
Advertised EUR/USD minimum spread Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
Realised average spread Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
Trading commissions Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
Overnight holding cost Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
Inactivity charge policy Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
