Interfaz traducida. Los textos de fuentes y algunos detalles metodológicos se conservan en inglés.
VALORACIONES · EXPLORA CADA NIVEL
Una valoración. Todas las razones.
Elige tu residencia o explora las empresas detrás de las marcas.
¿Dónde vives? · Selecciona tu país con los círculos. Mostramos la empresa y las condiciones verificadas para sus residentes.
Piloto · incluye valoraciones editoriales simuladasCómo se convierte en una valoración completa
Los datos publicados y las evaluaciones editoriales completas sustituyen la demo al aumentar la cobertura. Se aplica el método publicado.
Current data coverage: 2% of planned weight. Coverage describes our evidence, not broker quality. Método →
AustraliaCalculated from: Australia · 1 shared parameters · 1/11 listed residence marketsRated: IG, OANDA, Pepperstone. Same parameters for the rated brokers. Missing ratings are not zero. Criteria can differ between countries.
Guía de colores — ¿qué indican los países?
Market priority: UK, US, Singapore and Hong Kong lead by FX turnover in the BIS 2025 survey. Remaining countries follow an editorial priority order, not a statistical ranking. This order does not change rating weights.
Los colores indican cuánta información tenemos, no la calidad del bróker.
Verde · ambas medidas disponiblesBoth tracked measures are available for every displayed broker.
Amarillo · información parcialSome observations are available, but coverage differs or is incomplete.
Rojo · faltan datos de valoraciónCompanies are identified, but their rating observations are not available yet.
…Vacío · en verificaciónAt least one company or offer still needs verification; no observations are available for this selection.
∕Gris con barra · no aplicableWe have verified that this option does not apply.
Borde cuadrado · tu selecciónThe chosen country applies to all three brokers.
Explorar valoraciones: cálculos, criterios y fuentes
Comparando todos los brókeres mostrados.
Score mix — data and editorial contribution
60% · Data40% · Editorial
First convert the data score to a percentage. Add its 60% contribution to the editorial percentage’s 40% contribution. A simulated 50% editorial input contributes 20 percentage points. Real assessments use the published criterion weights. Displayed inputs are rounded; contributions use the unrounded data score.
These criterion weights are managed in the editorial database. They apply to completed editorial assessments; simulated inputs remain explicitly labelled and are not derived from these criteria.
Public review evidence, including Trustpilot30% of editorial
Website navigation and usability25%
Clarity of pricing, conditions and information30%
Visibility of the contracting company and key documents15%
Published documentary audits have dated observations, cited sources and explicit scope. See the UK audit and checklist. Review-platform scores alone are not editorial assessments. Brand-wide review evidence must not be presented as jurisdiction-specific evidence, and evidence already scored in the data component must not be counted twice.
01 · Data component: Residence & entity — where the rating comes from
The same residence and parameters for all brands; contracting entities may be regulated in different countries. Missing values are never zero.
Effective dimension weight: 100% of the partial score.
OANDA
Trading costs · partial
4.5/5
Effective dimension weight: 100% of the partial score.
Pepperstone
Trading costs · partial
3.7/5
Effective dimension weight: 100% of the partial score.
Each planned dimension has 20% of the data-component weight (the data component itself has 60% of the combined rating). The partial score normalises only shared available weights.
03 · Cost parameters — compare each contribution
Open a parameter to see each rated broker, including conversion, weight and source. Unrated brokers have no contribution.
Advertised EUR/USD minimum spread 10% planned cost weight → 100.0% of this partial score
Cash FX CFD advertised minimum EUR/USD spread: 0.6 pips (points). Spread-only pricing; financing and other charges excluded. The historical average spread also displayed by IG Australia is not used.
Observed 2026-09-12 · review due 2026-10-12 Record ig-au-eurusd-20260912 One broker-published source; no independent execution sample or statistical confidence estimate.
Standard spread-only EUR/USD CFD pricing, advertised from 0.7 pips. Raw pricing excluded. Financing and other charges excluded; not a realised average.
Observed 2026-09-12 · review due 2026-10-12 Record oanda-au-eurusd-20260912 One broker-published source; no independent execution sample or statistical confidence estimate.
Pepperstone
Residents of Australia
3.7/5
Contribution: 3.7 × 100.0% = 3.7
04 · Input, conversion & source
Original input: 1 pips
clamp(1 + 4 × (2 − 1) ÷ (2 − 0.5), 1, 5) = 3.7/5
Pepperstone Group Limited
Standard account EUR/USD minimum spread: 1 pip. No FX commission on Standard. Razor and spread-betting pricing excluded. Financing and other charges excluded.
Observed 2026-09-12 · review due 2026-10-12 Record pepperstone-au-eurusd-20260912 One broker-published source; no independent execution sample or statistical confidence estimate.
Realised average spread Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
Trading commissions Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
Overnight holding cost Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
Inactivity charge policy Excluded · no common evidence
This parameter contributes no weight. Missing evidence does not indicate poor performance.
